Monday, February 15, 2016

Doskozhanova Aizhan: Al-Farabi’s Outlook on Religion

Al-Farabi’s Outlook on Religion

Doskozhanova Aizhan
PhD Student in Philosophy,  
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Almaty, Kazakhstan



1.​ General description of religion
Before considering to the analysis of Abu Nasr al-Farabi’s relation to religion, it is important to define what religion is, in general.
A religion is a set of beliefs that is held by a group of people. 
The beliefs are about the world and the people in it, about how they came into being, and what their purpose is. These beliefs are often linked to supernatural beings such as God, a number of gods or spirits. 
They may also be linked to an idea such as a path that the spirit of each person should take towards goodness, truth and duty. This is called spirituality. Each religion has different ideas about these things.
Each religion also has a “moral code” which is a set of beliefs about how humans should act. Each religion usually has their own type of “devotions” when people worship or pray. They often have rituals (special things that are always done in the same way) for certain times of the year or certain times of a person’s life.
Other words are “faith” and “belief system”. Altogether, followers of religion can be known as religionists. Some people follow more than one religion at a time.
The largest religions are Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism. Smaller religions are Taoism, Sikhism, Judaism, etc. There are many other religions.  People who do not believe in any gods are called atheists. People who say that they are not sure whether they believe or not are usually called agnostics.
In many religions, one of the main beliefs is that there is a “deity” (or god) who is a great creator spirit. 
In many religions, there is just one deity that the people believe in. In other religions, there are many deities who have different roles in the universe. 
In many religions, there are other types of spirits. These may include angels, devils and other such things which can be both good and bad.
Another main belief is that humans have “soul” or spirit which lives on after their body has died. The person's spirit is on a journey through life that continues after death. Most religions believe that what a person does during their lifetime will affect what happens to their spirit in the afterlife.
Many religions teach that a good person’s spirit can reach a special place of peace and happiness such as Heaven or Nirvana, and that a bad person’s spirit can travel to a place of pain and suffering such as Hell. 
Still other religions believe in reincarnation – that instead of going either to Heaven or Hell, spirits of the dead return to earth in a new body. “Morals” are the way a human behaves to other humans. Most religions make rules about human morals. The rules of how people should act to each other are different in different religions.
For some religions, following a “path” of goodness, truth and duty is very important. This is called Tao in China. In the teachings of Judaism, people were told to “love your neighbour as yourself”. In the teachings of Jesus, people were told to think of every single person as their “neighbour” and treat them with love.
Not every religion teaches people to be kind to all other people. In some religions, people believed that they could please a god by killing or sacrificing another person. Symbols are used to remind people of their religious beliefs. They are also used or worn as a sign to other people that the person belongs to a particular religion.
A symbol might be something that is drawn or written, it might be a piece of clothing or jewellery, it might be a sign that a person makes with their body, or it might be a building or monument.

2.​ Al-Farabi on the methods of religion and philosophy
In time of Al-Farabi, religious disputes are usually conducted on the fundamental principles of Islam, in which the uncertainty brought to big number of different interpretations and different points of view.
On the one hand, the various theological schools come as opponents of Islamic religious traditionalism, but do not break off their relationship with Islam.
On the other hand, philosophers also acted as opponents, basing on classical models of philosophizing. But often the position of the philosophers was that they often bypass the debate between representatives of religions and their opponents.
Some philosophers have recognized the priority of religious knowledge over philosophical one (like Al-Kindi). Others openly criticized the prophets as the deceivers (like Abu Bakr al-Razi). One more group has tried to find positive aspects in religious knowledge.
We can include Abu Nasr al-Farabi to the third group of philosophers-opponents. His position in relation to religion can be called neutral, since he was able to see in religion “an important political art”, which can be used for moral and legal peoples’ relations in society.
To indicate the term of “religion” Al-Farabi takes the word Millah, but in the Arabic language there is a different word – “din”. Both terms are widely used in the Quran, but mostly uses the term “din” in different meanings: “custom”, “reward”, “court”, “religion”. As a general concept “din” is applied to Islam, Judaism, Christianity, and the pagan beliefs.
Unlike the term “din”, the term “millah” has a special meaning and translated from Arabic as “religious community”, associating with “Ummah” (Islamic community). Using the term “millah” Abu Nasr wanted to emphasize that he considers religion in the context of a “civic science”, which is part of his “Classification of the sciences.” However, in the part “Civil Science” Al-Farabi avoids religion, studying only Islamic law (fiqh) and dogmatic theology (‘ilm al-kalam). “Fiqh of actions includes civil law and, consequently, Fiqh is one of the parts of civil science and included in practical philosophy. Fiqh of actions covers parts of the whole which is part of the theoretical philosophy or abstraction of things, also included in theoretical philosophy. Consequently, Fiqh is a part of theoretical philosophy and is [part of] a theoretical science.” [1, p.38].
Al-Farabi devoted to religion the only treatise “On Religion”. However, the content of the treatise is reduced to the problem of social and political coexistence of the people. In his treatise, so-called “virtuous religion” plays the role of “helper” of philosophy in “achieving the goal that is the ultimate happiness.”
Al-Farabi wrote that if the cities do not have a common religion, unifying attitudes, beliefs and actions of citizens, it is impossible to achieve real happiness. Such an attitude toward religion was determined by the fact that people (who cannot think philosophically) needed the rules existed in the form of simple and clear laws sent from above.
Relying on ‘the view of ancestors’, Al-Farabi defines religion as an imitation to philosophy. According to him, philosophy predates religion in time. As Majid Fakhry mentions “In point of time, he observes, the rise of religion (millah), ‘humanly speaking’, is subsequent to the rise of philosophy.” [2, p.12]. Both religion and philosophy are close to each other, since they are covering the same subjects and make final principles for the existing things, as well as they explain reaching the maximum happiness as the ultimate goal of human existence. However, if a philosophy gives credible evidence, a religion gives belief. Religion and philosophy lead humans to the truth, but via different approaches: religion addresses the wide, uneducated public, whereas philosophy addresses the selected few. That is why in some cases rulers of cities could use religion as their instrument of getting their own interests. “A second kind is represented by those, who follow some aims of the ignorant city such as honour and wealth or some pleasure or else. They realize that the laws of the excellent city are in their way and hence turn against the views of the excellent city and try to reject them all as false, whether they are symbols of truth or a part of truth itself with which they have become acquainted.” [3, p.283].Generally, Al-Farabi associates the concept of ‘virtuous city’ with the concept of ‘virtuous religion’; this moment is the most extensively analyzed in his treatise The Attitude of Philosophy to Religion.
The first thesis of his treatise Al-Farabi defines religion as an opinion and the actions established by the first ruler for all inhabitants. He writes, “Religion is a standpoint and actions predefined by the conditions which the First Leader has prescribed for all of mankind.” Then he mentions that the virtuous ruler’s government “has to do the Revelation which descend from Allah”.
Even if Al-Farabi does not identify the divine mind called the Active Intellect with God, exactly revelation determines activity and views of virtuous society. So, according to Al-Farabi, the virtuous religion is akin philosophy. However, in Al-Farabi’s view, religion and philosophy do not conflict, if only philosophy is properly understood. All this leads to complete formation of civil sciences that includes religion as social instrument. Putting religion into dependence on the philosophy Al-Farabi states that the leading position in the field of theoretical knowledge belongs to philosophy. Philosophy is not “handmaiden/servant for theology,” and in terms of al-Farabi, philosophy is essentially primary than religion. So, religion is the only figurative and symbolic expression of philosophy.

References:
1.       Abu Nasr Al-Farabi. The Attitude of Philosophy to Religion. // Almaty, Abai Club Intl – 2014. – 112 p.
2.       Majid Fakhry. Al-Fārābī, Founder of Islamic Neoplatonism. His Life, Works and Influence. One world Publications. Oxford. England. 2002. – 168 p.
3.       Richard Walzer. On the Perfect State // Great Books of the Islamic World Inc. – 1998. – 571 p.


Gulzhikhan Zh. Nurysheva: Al-Farabi’s Doctrine on the Head of Virtuous City in the Context of Contemporary Kazakhstan

Al-Farabi’s Doctrine on the Head of Virtuous City
in the Context of Contemporary Kazakhstan


Gulzhikhan Zh. Nurysheva
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Almaty, Kazakhstan


 
Abu Nasr al-Farabi is rightfully considered as one of the greatest world thinkers whose teachings have always been and remain relevant in all stages of human history. The greatness of al-Farabi is in the fact that every man, a nation, and a state can find answers to their questions in his encyclopedic heritage and define path of future development. A well-known Kazakh writer Mukhtar Auezov speaking about the role of philosophy in human life and society described al-Farabi as a ray of light in the dark labyrinths of the human path to the truth.
The same definition can be given to the philosophy of al-Farabi. His philosophy is always modern, it is close to each of us, and it is capable of finding solutions to the most challenging issues, especially, nowadays when human history has changed quite unpredictably. We still hope that  we can find a way out from this crisis, and the philosophies of the great world thinkers, such as al-Farabi, will be our main helpers in overcoming this situation.
Taking this opportunity, I would like to talk about the way the legacy of al-Farabi has been studied in Kazakhstan. M.Burabayev, a famous Kazakh researcher of the legacy of al-Farabi, writes that al-Farabi was widely known to the Kazakhs in past centuries, but his works in Arabic were available only to the selected people. The fact is that during the Soviet regime the Kazakhs were forced to change their alphabet first into Latin, then into Cyrillic. It could be considered as a deliberate policy aimed at the destruction of the historical memory of Kazakhs. Fortunately, in spite of such harsh measures, Kazakhs were able to save their language, traditions, culture and rich spiritual heritage.
According to the aforementioned scholar, an eminent philosopher, historian, statesman and a diplomat Kazybek Tauasaruly (1692-1776), after spending about eight years in the Middle East, had deeply studied and translated many works of al-Farabi [1]. But the book of Kazybek named “From ancient times to my life”, written in 1776, was published only in 1993, when Kazakhstan reached its political and spiritual independence. In his book, Kazybek calls al-Farabi a wise ancestor, emphasizes his social and ethical treatises, but recognizes that the work of al-Farabi on the natural sciences were difficult to comprehend. There is evidence that Kazybek bought some works of al-Farabi and brought them back to his homeland, but these books were, unfortunately, lost.
Great interest to the heritage of al-Farabi has emerged in the 20s of the XX century. For example, a well-known politician Mustafa Chokai in his book “Turkestan under Soviet power” notes that the thoughts of al-Farabi on the origin of human society had a great impact on the views of many European philosophers. A famous Kazakh poet Magzhan Zhumabayev - that has became a victim of Soviet repressions in the 30s of the XXth century - glorified the name of al-Farabi in his poems. In his poem, written in the early XXth century and dedicated to the ancient Turkestan – Turan, Zhumabayev describes the activities of great thinkers born in holy Turkestan, as well as writes about Turkic music and about al-Farabi’s play on Kazakh dombyra. 
The most informative and fruitful period in the study of al-Farabi’s works began with the establishment of the Institute of Philosophy and Law under the Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan in 1967. In 1991, the Farabi researchers established a department of Farabi studies. It can be said that it has been the most stellar years in the history of Farabiology in our country. During these years, a great work in translating and publishing of his works on Kazakh and Russian languages was accomplished. The greatest and the most dedicated scholars have worked in the department of Farabi studies. A strong state support aimed on creating conditions for fruitful work of the department as well as the allocation of funds for the publication of the books should be deservedly mentioned here.
The President the Kazakh Academy of Sciences, a globally recognized scholar Kanysh Satpayev, played a big role in forming the school of al-Farabi. I would compare this wonderful time of true scientific creativity with the era of “the Collegium of Toledo” in the Middle Ages.
Inspired with a brilliant idea of Renaissance in the heritage of al-Farabi, the scientists as Akzhan al-Mashany, Agyn Kassymzhanov, Mukash Burabayev, Boris Osherovich, Clara Tadzhikova Elena Kharenko, Anatoly Kenissarin, Saule Satybekova, Galiya Kurmangaliyeva and others translated and published several volumes of al-Farabi’s works such as “Philosophical treatises” (1970), “Social and ethical treatises” (1973), “The logical treatises” (1975), “Mathematical treatise” (1972), “Comments on the Almagest of Ptolemy” (1975 ), “Historical and philosophical treatises” (1985), “Natural scientific treatises”, (1987) and “Treatise on music and poetry” (1992).
Only nowadays one can perceive the immensity of work accomplished by a relatively small group of scientists. This dedication helped the heritage of al-Farabi to become available not only for Kazakhs, but also to entire Soviet Union. It should be noted that the most systematic and scientific publication of his treatise was accomplished exactly in Kazakhstan.
As the famous researher of al-Farabi Ph.D. Galiya Kurmangaliyeva notes, the work of these scientists made the name of al-Farabi a symbol of Kazakh culture, and al-Farabi’s heritage became our national heritage [2]. Study of the heritage of al-Farabi gradually becomes the object of investigations in various scientific fields. As a result the articles and monographs of famous scientists, including not only philosophers, but also linguists, historians, mathematicians have been published.
Another important stage in the development of Farabi studies in our country began with the attainment of independence. New realities required new approaches to the study of the great thinker. The democratic changes in society have given new impetus for Farabi researchers who were greatly inspired by the opportunity to create freely and creatively without ideological dictates “from above”. Native language of Kazakhs was declared as the state one, and the new opportunities for its development became visible. New schools, universities, where Kazakhs could be taught in their own language, have been established. Naturally, the works of al-Farabi were translated into Kazakh language so that everyone could study him in his native language.
The state program “Cultural Heritage”, initiated by the President N.Nazarbayev, has become an impetus for the development of the studies of al-Farabi works. Works of many well-known representatives of the philosophical world, including al-Farabi, have been translated into Kazakh language within the framework of only one series called “Philosophy”. As a result, a 10-volume collection of his works has been published.
It should be particularly noted that the collection includes the works of al-Farabi “Small syllogism used by the mutakallimun”, “Theology”, “Analytics” that have never been translated before. The legacy of Al-Farabi was also highighted in separate volumes of the two cycles of the series named “Philosophy”: “The philosophical heritage of the Kazakh people from ancient times to the present day” (20 volumes) and “World Philosophy” (20 volumes). Most important fact to mention is that his works have been translated into Kazakh language from the original work. Thus, a new level of quality (substantially different from the ideological translations of the Soviet times) has been achieved.
The year 1993 was marked with an important event in life of Kazakhstan – with naming the Kazakh National University, the largest university in Kazakhstan, after al-Farabi. 
Issuance of the journal in the name of al-Farabi has become another important event in the history of Kazakh Farabi studies. Since the year 2002, a philosophic, political and spiritual journal called “Al-Farabi” has been publishing under the editorship of Galiya Kurmangaliyeva, a brlliant expert of the Farabi works that for many years has headed the department of Farabi studies at the Institute of Philosophy and Political Science. An interesting, scientific and easily comprehensible journal, which is aimed at forming the spiritual and ethical values, has played an enormous role in popularization of the ideas of al-Farabi. Nowadays it is deservedly recognized as one of the most respected scientific publications in Kazakhstan and CIS, which is included into the catalogue of UNESCO.
            Thanks to the above mentioned           results of scientific activities of Farabi researchers as well as the support of the government, the name of al-Farabi is well-known to every citizen of Kazakhstan nowadays. The educational institutions, institutions of art, streets and avenues in the cities, including one of the biggest avenues of Almaty, are named after him.
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (the leader of the country’s higher education and according to QS listed among the top 300 universities in the world) continues the noble and very responsible task in studying the works of al-Farabi. It is natural that Al-Farabi Kazakh National University designed its mission as the popularization and promotion of the ideas of the great thinker. The university carries out an extensive work on strengthening a research center of al-Farabi, development of the al-Farabi museum, publication of his works, organization of further scientific research within the framework of fundamental projects. Three volumes of a new edition have come out: a series of philosophical treatises of al-Farabi in three languages ​​– Kazakh, Russian and English.
Another important step is the introduction of a special course “Al-Farabi and the modern age” into the educational process of the university. Under the leadership of the university rector, academician Galymkair Mutanov, the scientists of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University and the Institute of Philosophy have published a manual with the same name, which became a handbook for students and anyone else who is interested in philosophy of al-Farabi. The undergraduates and doctoral students of philosophy, including familiar to you talented scientist Aizhan Doskozhanova, are engaged into the study of the philosophical legacy of al-Farabi.
In 2013, the university started a research and innovation project “Al -Farabi university smart city” initiated by the rector, an academician Galymkair Mutanov. As a good connoisseur of philosophy, he drew his attention to the doctrine of the virtuous city of al-Farabi and chose it as a fundamental idea on this new project. As Galymkair Mutanov notes, “... smart-city project is actively and successfully implemented in all developed countries, but it is understood in purely housing and communal sense – in terms of quality of life of its citizens through the use of information and communication technologies. A specific character of our idea of smart university is in combination of humanistic and technological platforms, harmony of material and spiritual principles. In fact, the prototype of the smart city is a virtuous city, presented in the treatises of al-Farabi as a just and humane society, the most important signs of which are spiritual values ​​and cooperation in achieving the best possible life” [3].
A constant propaganda of the ideas of al-Farabi is necessary for the realization of the main idea of the virtuous city of al-Farabi – achievement of a common happiness together. It is necessary to ensure that the ideas reach each inhabitant of the city striving for the virtuousness. Pursuing this aim, the international Farabi Forum (under the direct supervision of Mr. Galymkair Mutanov) is being organized for the third year in a row, where the organizer of a today’s symposium – Mr. Vasileyos Syros participated as well.  
In the content of the “Al -Farabi university smart city”, as well as in the philosophy of al-Farabi, the understanding of the role of the ruler of the city is particularly important. 
It is well-known that the development of the countries and nations is largely determined by the personality of a ruler; which is the reason of many philosophers’ interest in role of the state ruler. 
For example, Plato believed that the ruler should be a philosopher seeking for knowledge, he is an honest person, loving the truth and rejecting the lie, since he is the only one able to see an ordered and an ideal existence with no place for injustice. The ancient philosopher argued that only this type of a governor can change the course of history; and the presence of such person in the community will ensure the achievement of yet unrealized ideas. According to Plato, the governor has a good memory, ability for learning, and is just, courageous and wise. [4]
Continuation of the teachings of Plato on the governor of the state can be found in the works of the Al-Farabi. It should be noted that the cardinal point for the whole system of al-Farabi is in the provision stating that “the purpose of human existence is to achieve the highest happiness, which people can achieve only in the virtuous city and often under the guidance of a teacher and mentor” [5]. The virtuous city is different from all other human societies since it is an association of people aimed at mutual assistance in acts, with which the true happiness can be acquired. Self-isolation and loneliness cannot make a man happy. Interestingly, almost exactly the same Kazakh proverb says, “the light of a man can be found with another man”.
Virtuous city of al-Farabi is based on the hierarchy. Hierarchy involves not only the relation of domination and subordination, but also harmony and balance. The hierarchy reflects the objectiveness of the space order, a reflection of which could be found in the reality of Earth’s order. Al-Farabi believed that life on Earth is the reflection of the wonderful harmony of the cosmos since the laws of social development are related to the eternal laws of existence. According to al-Farabi, it is impossible to build a perfect society without knowing the mysteries of the world harmony.
Who should be the ruler of a virtuous city? Another interesting idea of al-Farabi is that people are divided into leaders and followers. Not everyone has the ability to lead. Anyone who is always able to accomplish anything he is indicated to do will never be the leader. Nevertheless, if that person is able to study and learn, he might acquire the ability to lead another person, still being led by another person simultaneously. He is called a second ruler, and according to al-Farabi this kind of leadership can be carried out in agriculture, trading, and in other sectors of the city.
The head of the city in its absolute meaning is the one who does not need to be governed. This man has excellent natural qualities; his soul is connected with an active mind and people governed by such leader, who live together and united by a common place of residence – are the most virtuous, superior and happy people. In modern language such heads of the city are called leaders. They have always played and continue to play a decisive role in the history of mankind thanks to the logical and creative thinking, the courage and high moral principles.
            Head of the city, according to al-Farabi, should possess special leadership qualities, which, in turn, are divided into the innate and the acquired ones. Al-Farabi presents the acquired qualities of head of the virtuous city through his ability to connect with an active intelligence with the help of power of imagination or acquired intellect. He notes that good deeds and statements of the head do not come from him, but are counselled by the active intellect.
Al-Farabi mentions the difficulty of finding the combination of all these qualities in one person since people gifted with such traits are extremely rare.
Al-Farabi believed that the members of the city differ from each other same way as the organs of one body differ in their nature and abilities. And similarly to the hierarchy in the body that terminates at the organs, which do not rule, but only obey, the state hierarchy ends with the social class, whose only responsibility is in subordination and execution of orders.
Al-Farabi compares the head virtuous city with the heart – the main organ of the human body. Heart is the cause of the existence and location of other certain organs of the body. If any of the body organs come to disorder, life of the whole body will not stop, but if the heart fails, the person dies. Al-Farabi considered the heart as a concept closely related to the concept of “soul”, and not only physiologically, but also philosophically. A person manifests his spiritual world through his heart, thanks to it he communicates with other people, with society, nature and God. Al-Farabi attributes to heart all the functions of consciousness: thinking, will, sensation, expression of love and conscience. Moreover, heart is the center of life – physical, spiritual, and mental. It is the source of human experience: it can be a source of love and hatred, heat and cold. If it is opposed to God, then it is “petrified” and “grows cold”. A great Kazakh thinker Abai thinks the same. In his philosophical “Words of edification” he wrote: “Will, mind and heart ... You should unite around the heart and obey it... I will give preference to heart if you do not come to agreement.” [5].
Continuing our thoughts on virtuous city of al-Farabi, we can note that al-Farabi compares the head of the virtuous city with the Supreme Existence because it brings the same order and harmony in the management of the city, which the Supreme Existence contributes to the world harmony. As noted above, ideal for al-Farabi is the unity of knowledge and action – knowledge about the true happiness and actions in accordance with this knowledge. Therefore, one of the tasks of the city head is in directing the citizens to the commitment of acts that lead to the achievement of happiness. Direction to happiness of the citizens of the virtuous city starts with education, strengthening and preserving the virtues in the souls of citizens, as virtues (as well as vices) are assigned as a result of frequent repetition.  We shall note that this task, entrusted to the head of the virtuous city, assumes knowledge of the human soul.
As and when necessitated, the head of the virtuous city should rule in accordance with two rules: the method of persuasion, which is in the first place, and by compulsion, which is to be applied against the rebellious and disobedient citizens who are not voluntarily impelled to the prudence. The head of the virtuous city should manage people with love, because in return this impels a reciprocal feeling from the people. In this state, a person is capable of creativity, achievement of heights in any deed.
The head of the virtuous city should follow the principle of fairness in the distribution of wealth (material and moral). Al-Farabi connects justice with the categories of “middle”, “moderation”. This interpretation of justice is taken from the “Nicomachean Ethics” of Aristotle. Justice, according to al-Farabi, is not equality; instead, it is getting such share of wealth, which corresponds to his position or merit. With such qualities, the head of the virtuous city, of course, is a model for imitation by other members of the city.
In the history of mankind, there are many individuals who have qualities, described by al-Farabi. It should be noted that a number of such leaders can be found among many of our compatriots. Let us dwell on the personality of only one of them – the First President of Kazakhstan - Nursultan Nazarbayev. While analyzing his life and work, it is easy to notice that his personality not only fully complies with the demanding requirements ascribed to the political leaders of the modern state and society, but also personifies a civilized code of a ruler, already comprehended in the works of al-Farabi. There is no doubt that the establishment and development of independent Kazakhstan is closely connected with the name of Nursultan Nazarbayev who has noted in one of his speeches to the students that we are building a virtuous city, of which al-Farabi dreamed about. The history of mankind shows that during the most difficult periods of our development there always appeared leaders able to lead people to the new challenges. And this leader possesses those qualities peculiar to the leaders and is able to take crucial decisions.
According to al-Farabi, the first and the most important quality of the head of the virtuous city is to have “absolutely perfect organs, energies of which are so well-adapted to carry out the actions that they have to perform, that if this person decides to take any action using any organ he will be able to do it easily” [6]. In other words, the head of state must have good health. As a Kazakh proverb says, “The first wealth is health”. Our President is actively involved in sports such as tennis, golf, athletics, skiing, maintains a healthy lifestyle and draws his special attention at propagating similar lifestyle, especially, among young people. It should be noted that this trend is typical for almost all the heads of states of the today’s world.
Our President has always said that our country’s universities have excellent sports facilities and encourages students and teachers to engage in sport and activities, following the example of the world universities that are famous for their magnificent sports teams participating in the universiades, and the sports movements. 
Additionally, al-Farabi emphasizes that the head of the virtuous city “should naturally be able to perfectly understand and imagine all that he is said about, reflecting all the spoken in accordance with what he has in mind; should be able to preserve well in his memory all that he knows, sees, hears without forgetting anything” [6]. This, according to al-Farabi, is the property of a perfect mind. N.Nazarbayev has excellent knowledge in various fields of economy, science and arts and has always demonstrated a great understanding of the actual problems in those fields. For example, we have repeatedly witnessed the work of his wonderful memory when he remembered almost every person and the related discussions at the meetings with the young generation – the winners of the state program “Bolashak” initiated by him (a program that gives thousands of talented people the opportunity to study and undergo training in the best universities of the world), as well as at the meetings with business representatives, well-known writers, poets, actors, etc. 
Al-Farabi notes that the ruler should “have an expressive style and be able to state clearly all that he conceives; have a love for learning and knowledge, reaching them easily without any fatigue from training, nor pangs from the work” [6]. The well-known oratory skills of our President allow him freely and clearly express his thoughts equally in Kazakh and Russian languages. He constantly strives for knowledge, paying special attention in this study to works on philosophy. The President is the author of such books as “In the flow of history”, “Epicenter of Peace”, “Ten years equal centenary”, “In the Heart of Eurasia”, “The 
Another quality of the head of the city that al-Farabi stresses on is “to show determination in the accomplishment of what he considers necessary while being bold, brave, and without any fear and cowardice” [6]. We know that the decision on changing the capital of Kazakhstan from Almaty to Astana was very difficult. In making this decision N.Nazarbayev has demonstrated his courage and the foresight. In history there are many examples of the transfers of the capital, and almost in all cases it took rather long time to accomplish the change. Still, the President of Kazakhstan made a decision (which was dictated by the economic and political conditions) to move the capital in a very short time. The assessment of this bold step is still to be given to time and our descendants, but it is already possible to conclude that he was right.
Al-Farabi notes that the head “must naturally love justice and its advocates... to indemnify the victims of injustice, giving all that he considers good and beautiful” [6]. These are the features of the head of the city showed by N.Nazarbayev in the rehabilitation of numerous victims of Soviet repression in 30-s and 90-s of the XX century.
It is very important to note that al-Farabi compares the head of the city with a person who has a power to “treat the soul” [7]. A doctor treating the body and a statesman who heals the soul have different functions. For example, the doctor treats the hands only to make a person to be able to suffice the objects by hand. He is not interested in what – good or evil – actions this man will do. Al -Farabi notes that the statesman and the ruler should “know the entire soul, its parts, its limitations and deficiencies that contaminate the soul and its parts, and the reasons of contamination; he needs to know those states of mind in which a person conducts good actions; how to eliminate the shortcomings of urban residents; what skillful techniques we must use to achieve the strength (of virtue) in the hearts of the citizens, and know the way to always keep them (these virtues) there” [7].
I consider these requirements to the head of the city to be very reasonable.  A modern ruler at any level should have a very good knowledge both of the health of the body of each of the citizen as well as his soul, and should be able to timely recognize and treat their illnesses. He has to manage the affairs of every part of his city regardless of the size of the city. In modern parlance, the head should be aware of all affairs taking place in his city.
Despite the fact that the city is composed of different buildings that have different goals, he should strive to do something that brings benefit to all the residents; only then the city will function safely and its citizens lead by their wise ruler will reach their noble goal, which is the happiness. These words can be attributed to our university, and the Kazakh society as a whole.
Let us summarize the analysis of the doctrine of al-Farabi about the head of the city.
Al-Farabi establishes a close connection between the human happiness and establishment of the human association. He is sure that happiness is attainable if it is well planned and the people’s lives are wisely directed. This perfectly planned human association is the virtuous city itself.
Unfortunately, there are still ignorant people in the XXIst century engaged in wars and bloodshed, injustice and cruelty. An ignorant person cannot live in harmony with the environment, with people and with himself. These ideas are still relevant today – after more than thousand years after the death of al-Farabi. Most people do not think about the meaning and purpose of life, live by the “programs”: get an education, profession, family, make a career. Still, does it all make a modern man happy?
Undoubtedly, the doctrine of al-Farabi on the virtuous city and its head is very important nowadays. All should agree that the pursuit of happiness is the goal of each of our contemporary, the humanity as a whole. What is the meaning of true happiness, how to achieve it, and who should be the head of the city, who can show us the way to achieve the highest happiness; how should the society of people united by a common purpose look like? Is it all possible? The desire to find answers has formed the basis of the “Al-Farabi university smart city”.
It is true that the university drew attention to the one-sided approach of the creation of contemporary smart cities. This approach is often associated with the creation of comfortable living conditions with the help of science and technology. This results in a poorer meaning and the concept of the smart city. New technologies became dominant and are outrunning the spiritual and moral development of humanity. Non-compliance of the moral levels of society to its level of technical development can sooner or later bring the humanity to disaster.
The current situation requires a new vision on the formation of the moral values that are adequate to modern trends of development of society. Becoming aware of this problem has made the university to develop a research and innovation project called “Al-Farabi university smart city”. In the XXIst century the state of university cities is not only determined by the presence of infrastructure, financial and material resources. Modern universities should have a high level of moral development and should intend to provide special intelligent cities, promote the creation of cultural values ​​of the nation. The project “Al-Farabi university smart city” is aimed at creating a modern university, where the two main principles – the technological and the moral activity – are simultaneously developed in harmony.
This synergy brings the possibility of the transition to a fundamentally new quality of the university city; to the city that is producing new approaches to the development of modern society.
We surely understand the difficulty of building a virtuous city, which is very small in relation to the size of the country and the world overall. Still the work on the implementation of this project, i.e., its components “Sanctify world around yourself!”, “100 books”, “The cult of healthy body”, “Green Campus”, etc, are already yielding positive results. The university management, following the ideas of al-Farabi, has strict requirements to the heads of mini-cities – various structures of the university. The future of virtuous city depends on their personal characteristics, on the level of concordance to the characteristics of the head of the city.
It could be concluded that the philosophical doctrine of al-Farabi remains relevant at all times of development of human society and every modern man can find the answers in the works of al-Farabi to his concerns on all issues of social development as well as his individuality. 
 
Literature:
1. Burabayev M.B. Outstanding medieval philosopher Abu Nasr Al-Farabi // Al-Farabi. Selected tracts. Almaty, 1994. P.18.
2. Kurmangaliyeva G.K. Al-Farabi in the Kazakh philosophy: the present state and future prospects // Proceedings of the Round Table “Creativity of Al-Farabi in the socio-cultural dimension of the East and the West”. Almaty, 2012. P.19.
3. Mutanov G.M. and others. Al-Farabi and the modern age. Almaty, 2014.
4. Nurysheva G.Zh. History of Philosophy. Almaty, 2004. 180 pp.
5. Abai. Words of edification. Almaty, 2014. P.48.
6. Al-Farabi. About qualities of the head of the virtuous city // Selected tracts. Almaty, 1994. P.221.
7. Al-Farabi. Aphorisms of the statesman // Selected tracts. Almaty, 1994. P.267.


Assyl Tuleubekov: Study of being in Al-Farabi

Study of being in Al-Farabi

Tuleubekov Assyl
PhD Student in Philosophy,
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy 
University of Jyväskylä 
Jyväskylä, Finland


1. The Al-Farabi’s ontology
Al-Farabi calls the philosophical concept of the world as metaphysics. It is known that Aristotle considered philosophy as the doctrine of ‘things in existence’. This doctrine is outlined in the Aristotle’s “Metaphysics”. In Enumeration of the Sciences (Iḥṣāʼ al-ʿulūm), Al-Farabi portrays metaphysics as a discipline having a precise method (demonstration) and an articulated structure, in which a full-fledged ontology (the study of being qua being) in its different aspects precedes, first, a part dealing with the foundation of the other sciences and, second, a philosophical theology concerned, among other things, with Islamic issues such as God's attributes, divine names and actions. In all these classificatory treatises, the position of the Metaphysics with respect to the other works of Aristotle, or of metaphysics with respect to the other philosophical disciplines, is not stable, but varies according to the particular perspective that Al-Farabi adopts: significantly, in some of them metaphysics is presented as the culmination of the entire system of knowledge, for example, in The Philosophy of Aristotle [1]. Therefore, Metaphysics is the doctrine of the fundamental principles of being and knowledge.
The Al-Farabi’s metaphysics is sometimes called as ‘divine science’. Following Aristotle, who included over-natural forces into philosophy, Al-Farabi clearly separated the logico-gnoseological aspect of metaphysics from ontological one defining ontology as the special section of metaphysics. In texts in which Al-Farabi lays down his program for philosophical education, such as the Enumeration of the Sciences, he explains that metaphysics has three parts. The first one studies beings qua beings; the second studies the principles of the theoretical sciences, such as logic and mathematics; the third studies beings that are neither bodies nor in bodies and discovers that they form a hierarchy leading to the First or One, which gives existence, unity, and truth to all other beings. It also shows how all other beings proceed from the One [2]. 
In the Al-Farabi’s “Classification of the Sciences” metaphysics lies in the final place after such theoretical disciplines as linguistics, logic, mathematics and physics, that is, metaphysics comes as a synthesis of all theoretical sciences. At the same time, metaphysics justifies all principles of these sciences.
 “Metaphysics is divided into three subdivisions. The first one studies existing objects and processes that happen with them, because they are existing objects. The second one studies evidence of theoretical sciences... The third one studies existing nonmaterial items...” [3]. The main point of the work is that metaphysics is more encompassing than, and not reducible to, the philosophical theology of book Lambda. Following this aim, Al-Farabi first rejects the attempts to interpret Aristotle’s work along Neoplatonic and monotheistic lines (in this he has probably in mind al-Kindī's theologizing conception of metaphysics), and advocates a type of explanation akin to that of the Greek commentators (Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius). Then he derives from the universal nature of metaphysics, understood as the science having being qua being as its subject-matter, indications regarding its scope (it incorporates a part on philosophical theology, namely on the doctrine of the first causes of being), as well as on its oneness as an universal science (there cannot be more than one universal science), its name (by being more general than physics it is also “after” physics) and its overall content [4].
Let’s note the most important points of the Farabian ontology.
1. Substance is the main category of ontology.
2. Substance is a unity of form and matter. Form is both the essence and the outer side of things. Form is given directly, if you stop the movement of things at some moment. Matter is the substrate, the background which makes changes.
3. Being is intensity. Essence of things has levels of saturation by being: from the rarefaction to maximum fullness. That’s why we can say about “levels of beings”.
4. Being has regular laws.
5. Human ontology cannot be fully linked with destiny.
In Neo-Platonism, there is the idea of the First Impersonal Single/One who is above every being, every entity and knowledge. In the philosophy of Al-Farabi, the degrees of being come from this Impersonal Single/One. In this regard, the Al-Farabi’s views are close to this Neo-Platonic idea. The Sky, stars, Earth, water, stones, plants, animals, people are combined in the concept of an ‘object’. The object is the accidence of being. Substance is ‘what’, while accidence is ‘how’.
Relation of substance to accidence has an important place in the Farabian philosophy.
In a broad sense, accidence includes all kinds of expressions of substance. This is the famous nine Aristotelian categories, which come after substance (entity): quantity, quality, relation, time, place, state, condition, action, suffering from actions. Relation of substance to accidence has an important place in the Farabian philosophy.
In a narrow sense, accidence is accidental feature of substance. In the Al-Farabi’s philosophy, there is a term ‘al-faid’, which means the expiration. This term means the Neo-Platonic term of emanation. According to Al-Farabi, the whole world is an emanation of the Impersonal Single/One, in whom we can see hierarchically organized stages of being.
“The First Impersonal Single/One is the cause of all beings, in general. He is free from defects. His existence is completely virtuous in the highest degrees”.
·          Necessarily existing essence – a thing, which existence determined by its deep essence.
·          Potentially existing essence – a thing, which does not come from its existence.
As the initial link of causality of everything, the essence of the First Impersonal Single/One comes as the opposite to everything else, being of which is done thanks to another. This “different cause”, through which all other things get their existence, is the First Cause/Reason. The First Cause/Reason can be proved only by the absence of external reasons for Him; so Al-Farabi said that “He does not exist for anything else and there is no other cause before Him”. He realizes Truth and Life.
These words of Al-Farabi on the essence of the First Cause/Reason demonstrate his dependence from the Plotinus’ teachings about emanation and represent the Universe with a strong pantheistic character, proving the close link of substantial God with the Universe. In addition to the First Cause/Reason, Al-Farabi includes ten minds into the heavenly world, which he sometimes calls “the second causes”.
The second causes live in nine areas:
·          the first heaven,
·          the sphere of the fixed stars,
·          Saturn,
·          Jupiter,
·          Mars,
·          the Sun,
·          Venus,
·          Mercury,
·          the Moon,
·          10th mind – Actual Mind/Intellect – has no own area.
The Earthly World with its material substrate and forms corresponds to the Actual Mind/Intellect.

2. The Farabian doctrine of being and Neo-Platonism
Metaphysically-theological conception of the world in the Al-Farabi’s philosophy was transformed into cosmology and astronomy. The most fundamental of these assumptions, which the Neoplatonists shared with the majority of intellectuals of the ancient world, including most pre-Socratic thinkers as well as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and their followers, is that mindful consciousness (nous, often translated as thought, intelligence, or intellect) is in an important sense ontologically prior to the physical realm typically taken for ultimate reality (Mind over Matter). There existed a dispute between Plato and Aristotle over whether or not the objects of mindful consciousness (abstract concepts, Platonic or otherwise, numbers, geometrical properties, and so forth) are also ontologically prior, but the Neoplatonists regarded this fact as a matter of inconsequential detail. And so, following a venerable and abiding tradition of Mind over Matter, Neoplatonism inevitably turned out to be an idealist type of philosophy [5]. In the context of cosmology, which expressed the doctrine of emanation, Al-Farabi develops the teachings on “the earthly world”, in which the elements of materialism come very clearly.
The Neo-Platonists brought emanation to the depth of the matter, in which emanation turned into darkness. Al-Farabi describes emanation only as the Actual Mind/Intellect, understanding matter as lightness. Al-Farabi and neo-Platonists are similar in their desire to identify the existence of all being with knowledge. Thus, a Single/One in Neo-Platonism and the First Reason of Al-Farabi are the identity of thinking and being. The presentation of the third part shows that Al-Farabi has abandoned al-Kindi’s view of the One as beyond being and intellect, and that he equates some features of Aristotle’s Prime Mover who is an Intellect with those of the Neoplatonic One. He also distinguishes the First or God from the agent intellect. As the First knows only itself, emanation is necessary and eternally gives rise to the world. Al-Farabi intends to tidy up all the unresolved questions of Aristotle’s Metaphysics and to develop a theological teaching (Druart 2005, 334) [2]. Realization of universal knowledge happens through the eternal emanation of the divine essence. Creative force of the First Reason lies in its knowledge about its nature, and such kind of knowledge is a necessary knowledge of the Universe.
Minds, i.e. ideal principles, create the Universe and determine its ideal nature. But the difference of conception of Al-Farabi from Plotinus is that Al-Farabi allocates significant place of matter. In the earthly world, everything consists of two components: matter and form. The thesis of Al-Farabi on the organic unity of form and matter has also materialistic character. “The form without matter can have neither substance nor being”. Al-Farabi considers matter as one of the steps in the hierarchy of being.
According to Al-Farabi, the Universe is as eternal as God. In full accordance with Aristotle, Al-Farabi believes that movement is the transition from potentiality to eternal reality. Time is as eternal as movement. In determining time of Al-Farabi counted that time is a characteristic of the movement. Recognition by Al-Farabi the identity of world and God can be considered and his recognition of the eternity of the world, because he believed that God is the First Reason/Cause of this eternal world. Such view is supported by the unconditional recognition of the eternity of matter, motion, and time.

3. Human being as the highest form of being in the Al-Farabi’s ontology
In the earthly world, the hierarchy of being goes from lowest to highest: “The least perfect is primary matter; then up the steps of perfection –the elements, minerals, plants, animals without reason; and, finally, a reasonable animal (a man) whose intellect is the highest among any other animals.”
Considering human being as higher one in the development in the earthly world, Al-Farabi marks the major ‘forces’ of human soul:
·          Feeding force,
·          Perceptive force,
·          Force of imagination,
·          Thinking force, and
·          Aspiring force.

In this regard, Al-Farabi develops anatomy, physiology and human psychology. Al-Farabi recognizes a lot of the same abilities between a man and a woman, but he does not think that between the man and the woman the abilities of imagination and intellect are equal.
In summary, in the Al-Farabi’s philosophy a man has the highest ability to be similar both to the Actual Intellect and the First Reason/Mind. A man is capable to understand being, completing all the harmony of the world.

Reference:
1.       Arabic and Islamic Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, July 5, 2012.
2.       Greek Sources in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, October 2, 2013.
3.       Al-Farabi. Metaphysics, or Divine Science, 172-173.
4.       Al-FarabiMā yanbaġī an yuqaddama qabla taʿallum falsafat Ariṣṭū, Dieterici 1890, pp. 49–55. [What Ought to be Premised to the Learning of Aristotle’s Philosophy].
5.       Neoplatonism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, January 11, 2016.